As the company is a public entity, something entirely different than a private person, I don't think that there's really a reason for them to release the names of the poster OR remove the comments. The only tricky thing would be if former employees had signed a gag order of some sort?
My personal views: 1. Companies aren't protected the same way that a private person is and/or should be. 2. Private citizens, or even employees of the company, should have some rights to getting material off of a site if it defames them in any way. My reference point is that site that was getting sued because women had made untrue statements about a guy online that probably weren't true (link: http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/08/01/545/17812)
Tim
· 1 year ago
You need to update this.........it is full of lies.....just like the company and owner.....this comes from experience.
All Comments
As the company is a public entity, something entirely different than a private person, I don't think that there's really a reason for them to release the names of the poster OR remove the comments. The only tricky thing would be if former employees had signed a gag order of some sort?
My personal views:
1. Companies aren't protected the same way that a private person is and/or should be.
2. Private citizens, or even employees of the company, should have some rights to getting material off of a site if it defames them in any way. My reference point is that site that was getting sued because women had made untrue statements about a guy online that probably weren't true (link: http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/08/01/545/17812)