<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Community Guy - Latest Comments in New term: Love Leech</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://communityguy.disqus.com/new_term_love_leech/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:39:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New term: Love Leech</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/02/28/new-term-love-leech/#comment-1465791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I see it from both sides...as a blogger I hate the cheapy comments that are almost more about getting another link to their site than it is to plug a product.   Now that I work for a vendor in the space I feel almost... well... scared to comment lest I get regarded in the same vein.  From the industry side, transparency and sincerity should be the "golden" rules to follow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, I'm sweating a bit before I click the submit button for this comment. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Eder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:39:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New term: Love Leech</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/02/28/new-term-love-leech/#comment-1465790</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sure, when it sincerely and credibly stems from the context of the discussion and adds texture to it. It seems though in many cases the comment is an obvious "plant"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Furey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:04:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New term: Love Leech</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/02/28/new-term-love-leech/#comment-1465789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Patrick, thanks for stopping by.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So are there ANY cases where I might be able, as a rep of XYZ company to participate in the conversation in your opinion? Or is any conversation fruit of a poisoned tree?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:35:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New term: Love Leech</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/02/28/new-term-love-leech/#comment-1465788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I absolutely agree! It is mutant of spam.&lt;br&gt;It has always seemed so obvious to me that these transparent and vapid comments that are blatantly self-serving and contribute little or nothing to the topic at hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Furey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:29:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>