<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Community Guy - Latest Comments in iPod Touch &amp;#8211; nothing to do with the iPod</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://communityguy.disqus.com/ipod_touch_nothing_to_do_with_the_ipod/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:41:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iPod Touch &amp;#8211; nothing to do with the iPod</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2007/09/10/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-1465375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bummer thing about this device are the things "not" included. Calendar exists but in the same method as existing iPods. This means that you can't enter a new entry. Say, wha...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is no support for Notes. No biggie, but silly when you think about it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guess what? No email.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm sure it will get hacked in but the the whole selling point for me would have been the iPhone w/o the phone. I don't really want/need the phone, but the other services would have sold me. I'm sure that is all part of the selling strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm like you with tons of content, but I like shaking mine up without having everything at my fingertips. Too much stuff to wade through for my taste. I'll stick to my shuffle and cell phone combo for now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brooks Grigson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:41:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPod Touch &amp;#8211; nothing to do with the iPod</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2007/09/10/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-1465376</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jake, thanks for this article, you hit it right on the nose - this is a PDA.  I have to say that the iPod touch is exactly what I have been wanting for several reasons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) As a web (and mobile-web) developer I am always running my websites on different devices for testing and development.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) Being able to use the iPhone interface without having to get a new Cingular contract is awesome (I am still in a 2-year contract with Verizon).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) I have a 30GB iPod Video and is it about 75% full (15% of that videos).  I have never really liked watching videos on the 2 1/2" screen with the iTouch (I renamed it for Apple!) I will have 3 1/2" (yes, an extra inch does matter) that is a 40% increase in screen size.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I must disagree 98% about the fact that the PDA market is dead.  Firstly, the iPod Phone is a PDA by definition.  Also, Palm (still my favorite) is releasing new units on a regular basis.  Plus, HP just announced another round of Pocket PC connected PDAs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[I also agree with Dax, no moving parts is a good thing for battery, heat and reliability]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew J</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:11:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPod Touch &amp;#8211; nothing to do with the iPod</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2007/09/10/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-1465377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tell you, I'm a bit disappointed about the file size, but I guess it's a necessity considering the screens battery usage.  To add the movable parts of a hard drive to the drain, would likely be too much.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dax&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dax Davis</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:27:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>