<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Community Guy - Latest Comments in Eisner: Writers strike is stupid</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://communityguy.disqus.com/eisner_writers_strike_is_stupid/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:52:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Eisner: Writers strike is stupid</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2007/11/07/1143/#comment-1465538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the writers are asking for a percent of profits from new media, then the not-yet-profitable argument doesn't make sense to me. A percent of nothing is nothing. A percent of something should be factored in when they negotiate with Steve Jobs. What's the problem? The writers, it seems to me, are just being smart be preparing themselves for the future when the big bang of convergence happens. (Let the record reflect I buy CDs because I don't trust hard drives.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">captain flummox</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:52:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>