<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Community Guy - Latest Comments in Defining &amp;#8220;non-commercial&amp;#8221; and the trouble with Creative Commons</title><link>http://communityguy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://communityguy.disqus.com/defining_8220non_commercial8221_and_the_trouble_with_creative_commons/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:23:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Defining &amp;#8220;non-commercial&amp;#8221; and the trouble with Creative Commons</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/01/17/defining-non-commercial-and-the-trouble-with-creative-commons/#comment-1465664</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jake,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've been thinking about this quite a bit since I wrote my original post on the topic. I've come to the conclusion that what we really need is one simple CC license. &lt;a href="http://www.cnet.com/8301-13556_1-9849881-61.html?tag=head" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cnet.com/8301-13556_1-9849881-61.html?tag=head"&gt;http://www.cnet.com/8301-13...&lt;/a&gt; Dan Heller has been writing about this in detail as well. I don't agree with aall his points but he raises a number of good ones about CC as it relates specifically to photography.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gordon Haff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:23:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Defining &amp;#8220;non-commercial&amp;#8221; and the trouble with Creative Commons</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/01/17/defining-non-commercial-and-the-trouble-with-creative-commons/#comment-1465662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ben, that's often what I do to. But that's the problem, right? Why bother using CC at all if you have to contact the creator? If CC is meant to "express intent", and I have to contact the creator to get clarification, CC is fundamentally flawed, IMHO.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Defining &amp;#8220;non-commercial&amp;#8221; and the trouble with Creative Commons</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/01/17/defining-non-commercial-and-the-trouble-with-creative-commons/#comment-1465663</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just contact the publisher and ask if I may use their photo. When you get their explicit approval you have nothing to fear, and they're always flattered that you thought enough of their work to ask.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:58:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Defining &amp;#8220;non-commercial&amp;#8221; and the trouble with Creative Commons</title><link>http://www.communityguy.com/2008/01/17/defining-non-commercial-and-the-trouble-with-creative-commons/#comment-1465665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I too have been concerned with this issue recently. Mostly as a hobby publisher of blogs. But my definition of hobby may be someone else's definition of commercial. So I've been searching only for CC that allows commercial use recently.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If I were licensing my stuff via CC and wanted to make the distinction you are suggesting between hobby sites and (let's say) companies earning over $x a year,  I would use the noncommercial license and then provide a link back to a page on my personal site that set out additional qualifications for free commercial use. Perhaps a registration form indicating how it will be used and where, an example of proper attribution, and contact info. Set the barrier as low or as high as you want it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just because you're using CC doesn't mean you still don't control the other aspects of your copyright.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JohnFrost</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:15:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>